RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

Finally got to e-mail and noticed all the messages.  I would oppose any
changing of wording to any recommendation at this time.  But it does go
to the issue that many people do not have a consistent definition of
what the terms in the recommendations actually mean.

I am still summarizing the results of the gTLD Registries meeting on
this subject where we went through each of the recommendations.  In that
summary I will note where there was confusion.

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & Business Development 

NeuStar, Inc. 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Ruth
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:58 AM
To: Nevett, Jonathon; Avri Doria
Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council 

Hmmm.  My understanding was that option 1 presumed a rebid.  We
definitely need to clarify this.

Greg

--- "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry for my lack of clarity.  We are under the impression that the
> "Renewal Expectancy" option already includes the right to bid at
> ICANN's
> discretion.  Thanks.  Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:20 AM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon
> Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council 
> 
> hi,
> 
> On 6 dec 2006, at 09.34, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> 
> > Avri:  On renewal, I would suggest changing the second option to
> say
> > "may rebid at ICANN's discretion."  That's what the RC supports.
> > Thanks.  Jon
> 
> 
> Thanks for the note.
> 
> If I understand correctly, you are offering a 4th possibility which  
> seems to me to be a compromise between proposal 1 - must rebid and  
> proposal 2 - renewal expectancy.  Since renewal expectancy was  
> suggested by NCUC i would not want to change their proposal without  
> their concurrence, but I think it is a good suggestion that might be 
> 
> able to bring those who support Proposal 1 and 2 into agreement.
> 
> What do other think about this?
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 



 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com