Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 6 dec 2006, at 11.31, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Finally got to e-mail and noticed all the messages.  I would oppose  
> any
> changing of wording to any recommendation at this time.  But it  
> does go
> to the issue that many people do not have a consistent definition of
> what the terms in the recommendations actually mean.


I would tend to agree about changing the wording of a current proposal.

But if there is a clarification of definition or a movement toward  
stronger levels support based on producing a refined proposal i think  
we should accept it as a way of making progress toward our  
objectives.  This is especially important in those areas where we  
have not yet been able to arrive at a measurable level of support.

thanks
a.