RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think the main words in my comment were "at this time."  Until such
time as these issues can be adequately addressed and discussed, we
should not change the wording on the fly.

However, we must clarify all of the ambiguous terms prior to the release
of the draft final report, whether in areas there are support or areas
where there are not..  

Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & Business Development 

NeuStar, Inc. 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:41 AM
To: PDPfeb06
Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council 


On 6 dec 2006, at 11.31, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Finally got to e-mail and noticed all the messages.  I would oppose  
> any
> changing of wording to any recommendation at this time.  But it  
> does go
> to the issue that many people do not have a consistent definition of
> what the terms in the recommendations actually mean.


I would tend to agree about changing the wording of a current proposal.

But if there is a clarification of definition or a movement toward  
stronger levels support based on producing a refined proposal i think  
we should accept it as a way of making progress toward our  
objectives.  This is especially important in those areas where we  
have not yet been able to arrive at a measurable level of support.

thanks
a.