<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:20:56 -0500
Put this way, NCUC's position was to favor Option 3.
>>> "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 12/6/2006 8:35 AM >>>
And there's option X, which may be what the DOC adopted with regard to
.COM:
renewal only if renewal would "serve the public interest." See, Page 3
of
the linked PDF, at No. 2.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/agreements/amend30_11292006.pdf
> Option 1 was a mandatory rebid with an advantage to the incumbent;
>
> Option 2 was a discretionary rebid with an advantage to the
incumbent;
>
> Option 3 was no rebid unless there are repeated material breaches.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|