RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council

[Alistair DIXON <Alistair.Dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think I'd broadly agree with Jon's characterisation of the options, though 
I'd note that the advantage to the incumbent in the event of a rebid would 
depend on their performance of the terms of the contract, ie if they had 
consistently met the terms of the contract they would have an advantage.

Alistair


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thu 12/7/2006 2:00 AM
To: Greg Ruth; Avri Doria
Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
 
That was my impression as well.

Option 1 was a mandatory rebid with an advantage to the incumbent;

Option 2 was a discretionary rebid with an advantage to the incumbent;

Option 3 was no rebid unless there are repeated material breaches.


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Ruth [mailto:greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:58 AM
To: Nevett, Jonathon; Avri Doria
Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council 

Hmmm.  My understanding was that option 1 presumed a rebid.  We
definitely need to clarify this.

Greg

--- "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry for my lack of clarity.  We are under the impression that the
> "Renewal Expectancy" option already includes the right to bid at
> ICANN's
> discretion.  Thanks.  Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:20 AM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon
> Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council 
> 
> hi,
> 
> On 6 dec 2006, at 09.34, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> 
> > Avri:  On renewal, I would suggest changing the second option to
> say
> > "may rebid at ICANN's discretion."  That's what the RC supports.
> > Thanks.  Jon
> 
> 
> Thanks for the note.
> 
> If I understand correctly, you are offering a 4th possibility which  
> seems to me to be a compromise between proposal 1 - must rebid and  
> proposal 2 - renewal expectancy.  Since renewal expectancy was  
> suggested by NCUC i would not want to change their proposal without  
> their concurrence, but I think it is a good suggestion that might be 
> 
> able to bring those who support Proposal 1 and 2 into agreement.
> 
> What do other think about this?
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 



 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com