[pdp-pcceg-feb06] more clarification

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:20:56 -0500
> From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Mawaki" <kichango@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
> 
> Put this way, NCUC's position was to favor Option 3. 
> 
> >>> "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 12/6/2006 8:35 AM
> >>>
> And there's option X, which may be what the DOC adopted with regard
> to
> .COM:
> renewal only if renewal would "serve the public interest." See,
> Page 3
> of
> the linked PDF, at No. 2. 
> 
>
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/agreements/amend30_11292006.pdf
> 
> 
> 
> > Option 1 was a mandatory rebid with an advantage to the
> incumbent;
> > 
> > Option 2 was a discretionary rebid with an advantage to the
> incumbent;
> > 
> > Option 3 was no rebid unless there are repeated material
> breaches.
> 
> 
>