<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[pdp-pcceg-feb06] clarification "renewal expanctancy"
- To: PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] clarification "renewal expanctancy"
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:10:56 -0800 (PST)
This is a quote from the clarification exchange on the list with Avri
and Milton:
"The concept of a "renewal expectancy" as we conceived it
contemplates a
rebid _if and only if_ the incumbent registry has performed so
poorly,
based on the explicit criteria in its contract, that ICANN basically
wants to take the TLD away from it.
The concept of a "rebid at ICANN's discretion" is completely
contradictory to the notion of a renewal expectancy. These are two
completely different policies."
thanks,
Mawaki
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|