ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Can we move the [pdp-pcceg-feb06 Task Force Report /PDP 06 call by one hour later?

  • To: PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Can we move the [pdp-pcceg-feb06 Task Force Report /PDP 06 call by one hour later?
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:14:35 -0400


If possible I would like to know how many people can make the meeting at this time. I want to make sure that we have enough people to, at least for this last meeting, cover each of the constituencies. The vote will span several days (probably 48 hours) after the meeting, but I would like to make sure that all constituencies are there to agree on the end game process.

If we can't get quorum at this meeting, then we will have to move it to another day, since it is impossible to move it to a different hour on the same day. I do _not_ want to do this as that will mess up the schedule with bringing this before the next council meeting.

Please let Glen know what your availability is for the meeting if you have not already done so. I will send out the text I would like us to vote on a little later today. As a reminder, the agenda is:

- Basic meeting prologue (attendance, interest stmts, agenda review)
- Last comments on final draft
  - Liz to cover what has changed since las review
  - Resolution of any issues
    (note, anyone with issues is requested to post them to this
     mailing list before the meeting.  Please note that we will not be
     reopening any substantive issues.)
- Agreement on final process
  - Review text of vote
  - Review schedule for vote
- initiate vote (text in another email to come)


On 18 apr 2007, at 12.49, Liz Williams wrote:


I am sorry -- I have other commitments which have been set in place to accommodate this meeting.

Do you want to "record" your support for moving that the report is sent to the Council and that it accurately reflects the discussions and agreements of the group?

I had thought that Philip would be on the call so that he could represent the BC's views if those were different from what is contained in the report?

Kind regards and I apologise -- this week is particularly full.


Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob

On 18 Apr 2007, at 18:22, Marilyn Cade wrote:

I am having difficulty in moving a commitment that conflicts with tomorrow's
call. It would be much better to move this call later by an hour. I
understand that some others on the group would also find this helpful. Can
we move it later by one hour?
I understand that this has been raised by a couple of other members/can we
please accommodate the change to an hour later.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:22 PM
To: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Task Force Report on ,Policies for Contractual
Conditions Existing Registries PDP FEB 06

[To: pdp-pcceg-feb06[at]gnso.icann.org]

Dear Task Force Members,

The final Task Force Report on
Policies for Contractual Conditions Existing Registries PDP FEB 06

is posted on the GNSO website in the  draft documents section

There is a Task Force meeting scheduled on Thursday 19 April, UTC 14:00.
Please let me know if you need the dial-in resent and whether there are
any observers you know who may like to join the call.

Thank you,
Kind regards,


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy