RE: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't hear Craig say that.  It's easy to check
with Craig, so I will.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stuart Lawley
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 12:42 PM
> To: Alan Greenberg
> Cc: Liz Gasster; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter
> 
> 
> there seems to be some mixed messaging or breaking news coming out of
> the recent Tokyo ICANN meeting that either the Board retreat has been
> moved to 9/10 September or an additional Board meeting has been/is
> being set for 10th September.
>  Can someone clarify this for the group and also any impact on the
> timing of the report.
> 
> I have heard this date from other sources too.
> 
> 
> see:
>
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100827_icann_tokyo_meeting_more_clarity
> _on_the_new_gtld_program/
> 
> 
> 
> Stuart
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> 
> > I note that at the GNSO meeting yesterday, there was a discussion
> about the sentence in Operational Guidelines & Timeline that says:
> >
> > "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a report with comments from the ALAC,
> GAC and GNSO Council not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-
> day advance publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new
> gTLDs."
> >
> > It was generally accepted that this timeline is not at all possible,
> since we will have to work rather hard to get a report out for that
> date, but there would be no time for each SO/AC to formally
incorporate
> their comments in that time-frame. There was some discussion that it
> could be reworded to say the report was due by the 13th and the SO/ACc
> would deliver comments after that date. However, most at the meeting
> were willing to just leave the words along, even though it was
> recognized as an impossible target.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > At 27/08/2010 11:23 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> The final CWG Charter is attached for your reference.
> >>
> >> Best, Liz
> >>
>