<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter
- To: Stuart Lawley <stuart@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter
- From: John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:09:49 -0700
Stuart, et. al.
There has been no ICANN Board of Director's Meeting scheduled for 9 or 10
September 2010. Also, I am not aware of any proposal to do so.
best regards,
John Jeffrey
General Counsel & Secretary
ICANN
________________________________________
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stuart
Lawley [stuart@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 9:42 AM
To: Alan Greenberg
Cc: Liz Gasster; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter
there seems to be some mixed messaging or breaking news coming out of the
recent Tokyo ICANN meeting that either the Board retreat has been moved to 9/10
September or an additional Board meeting has been/is being set for 10th
September.
Can someone clarify this for the group and also any impact on the timing of
the report.
I have heard this date from other sources too.
see:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100827_icann_tokyo_meeting_more_clarity_on_the_new_gtld_program/
Stuart
On Aug 27, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> I note that at the GNSO meeting yesterday, there was a discussion about the
> sentence in Operational Guidelines & Timeline that says:
>
> "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a report with comments from the ALAC, GAC and
> GNSO Council not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-day advance
> publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new gTLDs."
>
> It was generally accepted that this timeline is not at all possible, since we
> will have to work rather hard to get a report out for that date, but there
> would be no time for each SO/AC to formally incorporate their comments in
> that time-frame. There was some discussion that it could be reworded to say
> the report was due by the 13th and the SO/ACc would deliver comments after
> that date. However, most at the meeting were willing to just leave the words
> along, even though it was recognized as an impossible target.
>
> Alan
>
> At 27/08/2010 11:23 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The final CWG Charter is attached for your reference.
>>
>> Best, Liz
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|