Re: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think Stuart has a very good point here. Obviously what happened with .XXX is 
not something we'd ever want to see again. Applicants do need to know if their 
application would be getting any subjective treatment at any point, instead of 
being evaluated on a purely objective basis.

Stéphane

Le 31 août 2010 à 16:29, Stuart Lawley a écrit :

> Referring to Bertrands message this morning, I think it is critical that any 
> would be applicants are made well aware of the potential subjective treatment 
> of any controversial application (unlike the 2004 round that was purely 
> objective against published criteria) and that theses "judgement calls" will 
> be made relatively early on in the process.