Re: [soac-mapo] On "universal resolvability" and useful questions that emerged yesterday

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree, an appeal mechanism should be in place.

On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:

> Anthony,
> 
> 2010/8/31 Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> If it's ambiguous in one part of the world, then it's ambiguous, by 
> definition.   This should be a very high bar.   Who could judge it?  A 
> three-part process consisting of a quick look, a panel, and the Board.
> 
> three-part process is a good formulation. Basically, this is what the DAG 
> contains already (more or less). Just need to fill the criteria. 
> 
> maybe an element that is missing is appeal mechanisms. 
> 
> B. 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Le 31 août 2010 à 17:35, Antony Van Couvering a écrit :
> >
> >> -- Is the meaning of the string unambiguous (there are no other innocent 
> >> uses for it)?
> >
> > Anthony, who could judge that? I can think of several words that might seem 
> > unambiguous in one part of the world but not in another...
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the 
> Information Society
> Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign 
> and European Affairs
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
> 
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint 
> Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")