RE: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I have to agree with Stephane’s original observation. Although I did vote, I 
did not feel confident about any selection and was not sure what voting for an 
“issue” meant exactly.
Some of the most important “issues” to me – such as whether MAPO or 
“sensitivity”-based objections are based on standards or are just arbitrary; or 
whether other basic policy recommendations are mitigated or overridden – aren’t 
even on the list.

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Stephane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 2:35 PM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

Marika,

I found the poll confusing in many ways so did not initially take part. 
However, having given this some more thought, I would like to add my vote for 
some categories. Could you therefore please add an "ok" vote from me in columns 
1,2,3,4,5 and 7 on the spreadsheet please?

Thanks

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur général / General manager

INDOM.com<http://INDOM.com> Noms de domaine / Domain names

Sent from my iPad

Le 6 sept. 2010 à 20:11, Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> a écrit :
Dear All,

Please find attached the results of the doodle poll for review and discussion 
on the CWG Rec 6 WG meeting later today.

With best regards,

Marika
<Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls.pdf>
<Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls>