Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I admit to a similar confusion.

I did not know for sure if I was:

- agreeing that an issue was important
- agreeing that an issue was open even if i did not think it mattered much
- agreeing with the view point of the person who brought up the issue.


This is one of my general problems with WG polls.  In any reasonable and 
significant scientific poll, questions are first tested, and the 'same 
question' is asked in various ways.  Whenever we do one of these polls, at the 
end of the exercise, we don knot know what we have.  I know it is not supposed 
to be scientific, but if it isn't, how do we know what it means.

E.g.  I accept that I am the only one who thinks it is important to have 
identified the correct groups if we include an incitement clause.  Or is it 
that I am the only one who thinks that clause is inadequate now?  Or is the 
case that those who think that there shouldn't be an incitement clause do not 
think we waste time speculate on what the incitement clause we should not have 
might contai?  Or is it that ...


a.


On 6 Sep 2010, at 22:42, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> I have to agree with Stephane’s original observation. Although I did vote, I 
> did not feel confident about any selection and was not sure what voting for 
> an “issue” meant exactly.
> Some of the most important “issues” to me – such as whether MAPO or 
> “sensitivity”-based objections are based on standards or are just arbitrary; 
> or whether other basic policy recommendations are mitigated or overridden – 
> aren’t even on the list.
> 
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Stephane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 2:35 PM
> To: Marika Konings
> Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
> 
> Marika,
> 
> I found the poll confusing in many ways so did not initially take part. 
> However, having given this some more thought, I would like to add my vote for 
> some categories. Could you therefore please add an "ok" vote from me in 
> columns 1,2,3,4,5 and 7 on the spreadsheet please?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur général / General manager
> 
> INDOM.com Noms de domaine / Domain names
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> Le 6 sept. 2010 à 20:11, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached the results of the doodle poll for review and discussion 
> on the CWG Rec 6 WG meeting later today.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> <Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls.pdf>
> <Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls>