ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

  • To: "Robin Gross" <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:50:52 -0400

There is no intent to drop any issue unless we run out of time and if we do 
that would be noted.  We are simply ordering our focus according to the poll 
results.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Robin Gross
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 4:01 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

 

I wasn't quite sure what "voting for an issue" meant either, but did 
participate in the poll.

 

I voted for issues that seemed unresolved or where widespread disagreement 
seems to remain.  But just because I didn't "vote for an issue" doesn't mean we 
drop it.  For example, I did not vote for the "Independent Objector" issue 
because the conversation during our previous calls seemed to indicate agreement 
that we don't want such an objector.  My vote should not be interpreted to mean 
that I no longer think it important to change this policy, but only that the 
group seems to have already resolved that issue.

 

Thanks,

Robin

 

 

On Sep 6, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:





I have to agree with Stephane's original observation. Although I did vote, I 
did not feel confident about any selection and was not sure what voting for an 
"issue" meant exactly.

Some of the most important "issues" to me - such as whether MAPO or 
"sensitivity"-based objections are based on standards or are just arbitrary; or 
whether other basic policy recommendations are mitigated or overridden - aren't 
even on the list.

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Stephane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 2:35 PM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll

 

Marika,

 

I found the poll confusing in many ways so did not initially take part. 
However, having given this some more thought, I would like to add my vote for 
some categories. Could you therefore please add an "ok" vote from me in columns 
1,2,3,4,5 and 7 on the spreadsheet please?

 

Thanks

Stéphane Van Gelder

Directeur général / General manager

 

INDOM.com Noms de domaine / Domain names

 

Sent from my iPad


Le 6 sept. 2010 à 20:11, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

        Dear All,
        
        Please find attached the results of the doodle poll for review and 
discussion on the CWG Rec 6 WG meeting later today.
        
        With best regards,
        
        Marika

        <Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls.pdf>

        <Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls>

 

 

 

IP JUSTICE

Robin Gross, Executive Director

1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA

p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451

w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx





 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy