<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
- To: "Robin Gross" <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:50:52 -0400
There is no intent to drop any issue unless we run out of time and if we do
that would be noted. We are simply ordering our focus according to the poll
results.
Chuck
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Robin Gross
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 4:01 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
I wasn't quite sure what "voting for an issue" meant either, but did
participate in the poll.
I voted for issues that seemed unresolved or where widespread disagreement
seems to remain. But just because I didn't "vote for an issue" doesn't mean we
drop it. For example, I did not vote for the "Independent Objector" issue
because the conversation during our previous calls seemed to indicate agreement
that we don't want such an objector. My vote should not be interpreted to mean
that I no longer think it important to change this policy, but only that the
group seems to have already resolved that issue.
Thanks,
Robin
On Sep 6, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
I have to agree with Stephane's original observation. Although I did vote, I
did not feel confident about any selection and was not sure what voting for an
"issue" meant exactly.
Some of the most important "issues" to me - such as whether MAPO or
"sensitivity"-based objections are based on standards or are just arbitrary; or
whether other basic policy recommendations are mitigated or overridden - aren't
even on the list.
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stephane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 2:35 PM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Results of doodle poll
Marika,
I found the poll confusing in many ways so did not initially take part.
However, having given this some more thought, I would like to add my vote for
some categories. Could you therefore please add an "ok" vote from me in columns
1,2,3,4,5 and 7 on the spreadsheet please?
Thanks
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur général / General manager
INDOM.com Noms de domaine / Domain names
Sent from my iPad
Le 6 sept. 2010 à 20:11, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Dear All,
Please find attached the results of the doodle poll for review and
discussion on the CWG Rec 6 WG meeting later today.
With best regards,
Marika
<Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls.pdf>
<Doodle results Rec 6 WG.xls>
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|