<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:05:22 -0400
As should be clear from my previous comment, I completely disagree.
Individual governments do not have any legitimate authority over the expression
a _global_ infrastructure. If they don't like a particular TLD they can take
action against it within the boundaries of their local jurisdiction. They have
no right to claim a globalized blocking power. If they want such a globalized
power, they have to use lawful processes (which does not include GAC
resolutions or this WG, neither of which have been empowered by any
international law
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Gomes, Chuck
It seems to me that Bertrand's suggestions are helpful. Does anyone disagree?
I do have one question though: what is meant by 'introduction process'? Is
that the 'Initial Evaluation Process' or something different? We should use a
term that is used in AGv4.
Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|