Re: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What are you disagreeing with Milton? I don't think anyone is suggesting what 
you are assuming. 

Chuck

 

From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>; Marika 
Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government 
objections) 
 


As should be clear from my previous comment, I completely disagree.

Individual governments do not have any legitimate authority over the expression 
a _global_ infrastructure. If they don’t like a particular TLD they can take 
action against it within the boundaries of their local jurisdiction. They have 
no right to claim a globalized blocking power. If they want such a globalized 
power, they have to use lawful processes (which does not include GAC 
resolutions or this WG, neither of which have been empowered by any 
international law

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Gomes, Chuck



It seems to me that Bertrand’s suggestions are helpful.  Does anyone disagree?  
I do have one question though: what is meant by ‘introduction process’?  Is 
that the ‘Initial Evaluation Process’ or something different?  We should use a 
term that is used in AGv4.

 

Chuck