<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)
- To: "'Richard Tindal'" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:48:01 -0400
Either an "objection" is a "request to veto" or it is something else. Decide.
--MM
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard Tindal
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:36 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government
objections)
I dont think it's a veto. I think it's simply an Objection that is then
considered against certain criteria - with no guarantee the objection will be
successful
To my mind one of those criteria would be the context you describe below.
R
On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Mary:
What gives a government in, say, Saudi Arabia the authority to veto a TLD
application based in, and legal in, say, Denmark?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|