Re: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government objections)

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

I guess in that sense all objections (not just Recommendation 6 ones) are 
'requests to veto' from the Objecting party  (although in the Objection process 
a possible outcome is some form of agreement between the two parties).   

I'm just saying it's not a guarantee of success.     A high (to my mind) bar 
has to be passed for the objection to become successful

RT

On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Either an “objection” is a “request to veto” or it is something else. Decide.
> --MM
>  
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Richard Tindal
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:36 PM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Third "draft recommendation" (individual government 
> objections)
>  
> I dont think it's a veto.  I think it's simply an Objection that is then 
> considered against certain criteria  - with no guarantee the objection will 
> be successful
>  
> To my mind one of those criteria would be the context you describe below.
>  
> R
>  
>  
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>  
> Mary:
> What gives a government in, say, Saudi Arabia the authority to veto a TLD 
> application based in, and legal in, say, Denmark?