<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-mapo] RE: Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- To: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- From: "Frank March" <Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:14:15 +1200
Hi Milton:
sovereignity in a word. I am conveying my interpretation of what the
GAC would be likely to respond with based on discussion held in previous
GAC meetings. I do not seek to justify but to inform.
The discussion in the SOAC meeting turned to the purposes of the fee and
that is where some alternative suggestions for avoiding the requirement
started to appear
Best wishes, Frank
PS happy to have a detailed discussion of where I think the GAC is
likely to go in Vilnius if you like. I take it you will be there?
----
Frank March
Senior Specialist Advisor
Digital Development
Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic Development
33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON
Mobile: (+64) 021 494165
________________________________
From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2010 4:01 a.m.
To: Frank March; soac-mapo
Subject: RE: Note of GAC position on paying for objections
Frank,
What is the rationale for the GAC's position that it shouldn't
have to pay an objector's fee?
I hope there is something more substantive to it than the idea
that "my group should get a free ride."
How would you require other groups to pay a fee and not a GAC
member? I don't get it.
--MM
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frank March
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:47 AM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for
objections
I undertook during the meeting to circulate some text which
recognised the strongly held position of the GAC that no country should
be required to pay the objector's fee. Subsequently the discussion
moved on to looking at what constituted a government for this purpose (I
suggested using the GAC definition for membership). Then there was the
suggestion from Bertrand that GAC membership could be a requirement for
a no-fee objection by a government.
The discussion moved to the position of both the GAC and ALAC in
the objections process with the suggestion that either of these can
lodge an objection on behalf of a member. Since the GAC requires
consensus this would necessarily overcome any concerns about 'frivolous'
objections coming from this source. I suggest including a
recommendation along this line in our draft report.
----
Frank March
Senior Specialist Advisor
Digital Development
Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic
Development
33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON
Mobile: (+64) 021 494165
newzealand.govt.nz - connecting you to New Zealand central &
local government services
________________________________
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those
of the Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any
attachment from your computer.
________________________________
newzealand.govt.nz - connecting you to New Zealand central & local government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files transmitted with
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the
message and any attachment from your computer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|