<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-mapo] RE: Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- To: Frank March <Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:01:26 -0400
Frank,
What is the rationale for the GAC's position that it shouldn't have to pay an
objector's fee?
I hope there is something more substantive to it than the idea that "my group
should get a free ride."
How would you require other groups to pay a fee and not a GAC member? I don't
get it.
--MM
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Frank March
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:47 AM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
I undertook during the meeting to circulate some text which recognised the
strongly held position of the GAC that no country should be required to pay the
objector's fee. Subsequently the discussion moved on to looking at what
constituted a government for this purpose (I suggested using the GAC definition
for membership). Then there was the suggestion from Bertrand that GAC
membership could be a requirement for a no-fee objection by a government.
The discussion moved to the position of both the GAC and ALAC in the objections
process with the suggestion that either of these can lodge an objection on
behalf of a member. Since the GAC requires consensus this would necessarily
overcome any concerns about 'frivolous' objections coming from this source. I
suggest including a recommendation along this line in our draft report.
----
Frank March
Senior Specialist Advisor
Digital Development
Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic Development
33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON
Mobile: (+64) 021 494165
newzealand.govt.nz<http://newzealand.govt.nz> - connecting you to New Zealand
central & local government services
________________________________
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files transmitted with
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the
message and any attachment from your computer.
________________________________
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|