<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:05:12 -0400
If the purpose of fees is to eliminate frivolous objections, it seems to be
clear that a fee should be charged upon filing of the objection, and thus
before any evaluation process. The quick-look criteria should be available to
those filing objections to help them avoid wasting their money.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:30 AM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Another question occurs to me about fees.
>
> Would a fee need to be paid (and by objector and applicant?) before the
> quick look, or only after the quick look.
>
> a.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|