ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)

  • To: "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)
  • From: "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:01:04 -0400

I agree, and note that Richard used the phrase "Principles of Ordre Publique" 
in an earlier email. I've adopted it in the attached draft recommendation on 
the use of the term "incitement" (and thank Konstantinos for starting the draft 
and dredging up the various emails concerning the issue!)
 
I've also used the same font as Margie, in the hope it will facilitate editing 
and insertion.
 
Something on Quick Look to follow, shortly .... (I hope :)
 
Cheers
Mary 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: 
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the 
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584

>>> 


From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 9/9/2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Summary of Issues/Recommendations

Dear Margie,

Thanks for this, it is really helpful.

One point - I think we decided at this point to use the term 'ordre publique' 
and abandon the term 'public interest' when it comes to objections. I think 
'ordre publique' came out of our discussion with Carroll and it is something 
that Mary also suggested (?).

Thanks

KK


On 09/09/2010 19:33, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear All,

Please find enclosed for your review suggested language that summarizes the 
topics discussed and the proposed recommendations.  Although some of you are 
working on language to insert in this document, I thought this might serve as a 
starting point for you.

It is very difficult to glean all of the details from the email list, so please 
accept my apologies if I misstated the principles or the recommendations.   
Also,  there are areas where I was unable to sketch an outline of the issue or 
proposed recommendation, such as the Quick Look Procedure, Timing of Rec6 
Dispute, and Guidebook Criterion 4.  Hopefully volunteers can assist in 
describing the issue and proposed resolution.


Thanks,
Margie





As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the 
University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire 
School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow 
the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more information on the 
University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu

Attachment: Rec on Incitement.doc
Description: MS-Word document



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy