RE: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Mary.  I encourage comments and discussion of this.

Chuck

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:01 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of
Issues/Recommendations)

 

I agree, and note that Richard used the phrase "Principles of Ordre
Publique" in an earlier email. I've adopted it in the attached draft
recommendation on the use of the term "incitement" (and thank
Konstantinos for starting the draft and dredging up the various emails
concerning the issue!)

 

I've also used the same font as Margie, in the hope it will facilitate
editing and insertion.

 

Something on Quick Look to follow, shortly .... (I hope :)

 

Cheers

Mary 

 

Mary W S Wong

Professor of Law

Chair, Graduate IP Programs

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584



>>> 

From: 

Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: 

9/9/2010 5:55 PM

Subject: 

Re: [soac-mapo] Summary of Issues/Recommendations


Dear Margie,

Thanks for this, it is really helpful.

One point - I think we decided at this point to use the term 'ordre
publique' and abandon the term 'public interest' when it comes to
objections. I think 'ordre publique' came out of our discussion with
Carroll and it is something that Mary also suggested (?).

Thanks

KK


On 09/09/2010 19:33, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear All,

Please find enclosed for your review suggested language that summarizes
the topics discussed and the proposed recommendations.  Although some of
you are working on language to insert in this document, I thought this
might serve as a starting point for you.

It is very difficult to glean all of the details from the email list, so
please accept my apologies if I misstated the principles or the
recommendations.   Also,  there are areas where I was unable to sketch
an outline of the issue or proposed recommendation, such as the Quick
Look Procedure, Timing of Rec6 Dispute, and Guidebook Criterion 4.
Hopefully volunteers can assist in describing the issue and proposed
resolution.


Thanks,
Margie




 

 

As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with
the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of
New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have
changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx.
For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law,
please visit law.unh.edu <http://law.unh.edu>