RE: [soac-mapo] Revised Summary of Recommendations - Please comment by EOD today

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri.  It is not clear to me what change you suggested.  I see
that "age" was deleted and added back in and there appears to be a comma
missing between age and color. Please clarify what change you made.

Regarding Avri's comment that follows: " I had further made claim that
instead of discussing  frivolity, we mention the idea that they
determine whether the object is on valid grounds.  I.e. national law is
not a valid ground.  I thought this wording was accepted."  I don't know
that it was ever accepted but it can be added to our poll.

        Margie/Markia - Please include this in the poll.

I don't recall any group decision about this: "I thought we were going
to move away form the name DRSP?"  Are you suggesting that DRSP should
not be used for any of the four categories of complaints?  What would we
replace it with?  I know this was briefly discussed but I am not sure we
have time to deal with this one, especially since it has implications
beyond Rec6.

        Margie/Marika - Please add this to the poll or something like
it: "The term DRSP should not be used for Rec6 complaints."

Chuck

        





> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 7:14 AM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised Summary of Recommendations - Please
> comment by EOD today
> 
> not as quick.
> 
> added some comments and made one change.
> 
> a.