RE: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO Objection'

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Do we need to specify that it is the GAC/ALAC as a whole, not just individual 
members, who submit objections and that the GAC/ALAC must go through approval 
processes of these requests to submit an objection?

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:21 AM
To: Richard Tindal; soac-mapo
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO 
Objection'

Margie - please use this wording for the new poll unless there are any 
reasonable edits suggested.

Chuck

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Richard Tindal
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:48 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO 
Objection'

Section 11 of our draft Recommendations addresses the Independent Objector.

Per the discussion on today's call, I propose a new Recommendation 11.2 which 
reads:

If requested in writing by the GAC or ALAC the Independent Objector (IO) will 
prepare and submit a relevant Objection.  The IO will liaise with the GAC or 
ALAC in drafting such an Objection.    Any Objection initiated from a GAC or 
ALAC request will go through exactly the same process as an Objection from any 
other source and must meet exactly the same standard for success as an 
Objection from any other source.

Please feel free to wordsmith if it's unclear or poorly framed.

RT