<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO Objection'
- To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO Objection'
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:22:34 -0700
i think the recommendation is clear that only GAC or ALAC, and not their
individual members can trigger such an Objection.
To your second point, perhaps we can add this new, second sentence: "Such
requests from GAC or ALAC must result from the standard decision making
processes of those bodies."
RT
with their own internal processes for producing
On Sep 18, 2010, at 2:17 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Do we need to specify that it is the GAC/ALAC as a whole, not just individual
> members, who submit objections and that the GAC/ALAC must go through approval
> processes of these requests to submit an objection?
>
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:21 AM
> To: Richard Tindal; soac-mapo
> Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger
> IO Objection'
>
> Margie – please use this wording for the new poll unless there are any
> reasonable edits suggested.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Richard Tindal
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:48 PM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: [soac-mapo] New Recommendation 11.2 - 'GAC or ALAC Can Trigger IO
> Objection'
>
> Section 11 of our draft Recommendations addresses the Independent Objector.
>
> Per the discussion on today's call, I propose a new Recommendation 11.2 which
> reads:
>
> If requested in writing by the GAC or ALAC the Independent Objector (IO) will
> prepare and submit a relevant Objection. The IO will liaise with the GAC or
> ALAC in drafting such an Objection. Any Objection initiated from a GAC or
> ALAC request will go through exactly the same process as an Objection from
> any other source and must meet exactly the same standard for success as an
> Objection from any other source.
>
> Please feel free to wordsmith if it's unclear or poorly framed.
>
> RT
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|