Re: [soac-mapo] Proposed wording for 4.5

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Thanks Evan.

Does the word 'public' have significance in the first sentence?

Also,  when you say 'relating to human rights and/or civil liberties' is that a 
second skill the advisors must have,  or does that phrase qualify the type of 
international law instruments the advisors must have expertise in?

RT




On Sep 17, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> In response to today's call, I am proposing
> 
> - Consolidation of recommendation 6.4 and 17 into a new recommendation 4.5
> 
> - Elimination of Issue 6
> 
> 
> Here is my first attempt at a proposed 4.5: 
> 
> "The contracted advisors will be expected to have specific expertise in 
> interpreting law instruments of public international law and relating to 
> human rights and/or civil liberties. The CWG recommends that the Board 
> augment this with complementary expertise in other relevant fields such as 
> linguistics."
> 
> - Evan
>