<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Proposed wording for 4.5
- To: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Proposed wording for 4.5
- From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:23:03 -0400
On 18 September 2010 11:32, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks Evan.
>
> Does the word 'public' have significance in the first sentence?
>
> Also, when you say '*relating to human rights and/or civil liberties' *is
> that a second skill the advisors must have, or does that phrase qualify the
> type of international law instruments the advisors must have expertise in?
>
Hi Richard,
That wording is taken directly from the old 6.4 that had widespread
consensus in a previous poll. I would think that this would focus the
perspective but not limit it.
- Evan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|