ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] latest Rec & poll

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] latest Rec & poll
  • From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:26:14 -0400

Also. the new 4.5 is in the documentation, but missing from the new poll.

- Evan


On 19 September 2010 00:51, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Thanks Robin.  These seem consistent with our group discussions to date
> but let’s confirm them in our Monday meeting.
>
>
>
> Margie – Please make these changes in the report and highlight them until
> they are confirmed by the group.
>
>
>
> If anyone objects to these edits, please let us know on the list and/or in
> our Monday meeting.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Robin Gross
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:30 PM
> *To:* soac-mapo
> *Subject:* [soac-mapo] latest Rec & poll
>
>
>
>
>
> Just a couple minor wording suggested edits.
>
>
>
> *a.  14.      Expanded use of the Community Objections.*
>
>
>
> The heading of Rec 14 should be changed because we are explicitly NOT
> expanding the scope of objections that can filed under the "Community
> Objections" process.  Perhaps we should just drop the word "expanded" in the
> title, so it is just " Use of Community Objections".
>
>
>
>
>
> *b.  Recommendation 4.1:* Ultimate resolution of the admissibility of a
> TLD subject to a Rec6 objection rests with the Board alone and may not be
> delegated to a third party.
>
>
>
> We should probably add "or rejection" after "admissibility" in this string,
> so it is explicit that the board must also be the final decision on tld
> rejections.   So it would read:
>
> *Recommendation 4.1:* Ultimate resolution of the admissibility or
> rejection of a TLD subject to a Rec6 objection rests with the Board alone
> and may not be delegated to a third party.
>
>
>
>
>
> c.  Also the words "dispute resolution" exist a number of times throughout
> the document (including headings), so those should be changed to something
> like "objection process".
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
>
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy