Re: [soac-mapo] latest Rec & poll

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for noticing, Evan. I’ve added 4.5 to the end of the poll. If those who 
already completed the poll could go back and edit their entry, or let me know 
their choice, I’ll add it to the poll. Apologies for the inconvenience.

Marika

On 19/09/10 08:26, "Evan Leibovitch" <evan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Also. the new 4.5 is in the documentation, but missing from the new poll.

- Evan


On 19 September 2010 00:51, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Robin.  These seem consistent with our group discussions to date but 
let’s confirm them in our Monday meeting.

Margie – Please make these changes in the report and highlight them until they 
are confirmed by the group.

If anyone objects to these edits, please let us know on the list and/or in our 
Monday meeting.

Chuck


From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Robin Gross
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:30 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] latest Rec & poll





Just a couple minor wording suggested edits.



a.  14.      Expanded use of the Community Objections.


The heading of Rec 14 should be changed because we are explicitly NOT expanding 
the scope of objections that can filed under the "Community Objections" 
process.  Perhaps we should just drop the word "expanded" in the title, so it 
is just " Use of Community Objections".





b.  Recommendation 4.1: Ultimate resolution of the admissibility of a TLD 
subject to a Rec6 objection rests with the Board alone and may not be delegated 
to a third party.



We should probably add "or rejection" after "admissibility" in this string, so 
it is explicit that the board must also be the final decision on tld 
rejections.   So it would read:

Recommendation 4.1: Ultimate resolution of the admissibility or rejection of a 
TLD subject to a Rec6 objection rests with the Board alone and may not be 
delegated to a third party.





c.  Also the words "dispute resolution" exist a number of times throughout the 
document (including headings), so those should be changed to something like 
"objection process".



Thanks,

Robin





IP JUSTICE

Robin Gross, Executive Director

1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA

p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451

w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx