<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Question on your response to 5.4 polling in todays Rec6CWG
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Question on your response to 5.4 polling in todays Rec6CWG
- From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:29:01 +1000
Thanks Phillip but I was specifically asking Frank (during the last call
where he was unable to attend) on Chucks request, for his reasoning and if
that reflected any other GAC / GAC Member view(s) as requested as we
were discussing that matter...
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)
On 20 September 2010 18:37, Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Cheryl,
> well if I'm in the minority I regret I will stay there.
> I believe a supermajority should be used consistently and carefully.
>
> So here as in any other case I believe the decision body (here ICANN
> Board) should:
> ACCEPT recommendations from a lower body by simple majority
> OVERTURN recommendations from a lower body by super majority.
>
> Perverting the simple / super majority to suit the issue is dangerous
> ground.
>
> Philip
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|