<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- To: "'Stuart Lawley'" <stuart@xxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:44:23 +0100
I also think there is absolutely no need for this.
KK
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Law Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
Graham Hills building,
50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: www.komaitis.org
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stuart Lawley
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Richard Tindal
Cc: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
Absolutely no need for this.
Stuart Lawley
Via Wireless
On Sep 19, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Richard Tindal
<richardtindal@xxxxxx<mailto:richardtindal@xxxxxx>> wrote:
All,
We've discussed this on calls and email, and there seems to be a reasonable
level of support/ non-objection for it.
The Recommendation would look something like this:
Recommendation: The GAC may nominate a suitably qualified expert panelist.
In any situation where the GAC, or any of its members, are the initiator of an
objection, including any IO objection triggered by the GAC, a GAC nominated
panelist shall be recused. This recommendation shall in no way alter or
diminish the standard rules and procedures for challenging any expert panelist.
I wanted to get a sense of the group and potentially doodle poll this. Is
anyone strongly opposed to a recommendation of this nature?
Thanks
RT
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|