Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel

["Carvell Mark \(IE\)" <Mark.Carvell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Heather

I think the proposal below may stem originally from an intervention from me to 
the group about the composition of the expert panel and my enquiry whether the 
GAC along with the other SOs and ACs would have the opportunity to nominate 
independent experts. 

Bearing in mind the Greek proposal which had proposed a role for the GAC, I 
wonder whether this merits consideration by the whole GAC? Maybe there should 
now be an opportunity for all GAC members to comment, even if as Frank says 
this particular proposal may not be a runner.

Mark


________________________________

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx <owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx> 
To: Stuart Lawley <stuart@xxxxxxxxxx>; Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx> 
Cc: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Mon Sep 20 10:04:25 2010
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel 


I agree with Stuart .. there is no need for this and the GAC is unlikely to 
want to do it in any case
 

----

Frank March

Senior Specialist Advisor

Digital Development

Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic Development

33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON

Mobile: (+64) 021 494165

 


________________________________

        From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stuart Lawley
        Sent: Monday, 20 September 2010 8:20 p.m.
        To: Richard Tindal
        Cc: soac-mapo
        Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
        
        
        Absolutely no need for this.


        Stuart Lawley 

        Via Wireless 


        On Sep 19, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx> 
wrote:
        
        

                All, 

                We've discussed this on calls and email,  and there seems to be 
a reasonable level of support/ non-objection for it.

                The Recommendation would look something like this:

                Recommendation:    The GAC may nominate a suitably qualified 
expert panelist.  In any situation where the GAC, or any of its members, are 
the initiator of an objection, including any IO objection triggered by the GAC, 
 a GAC nominated panelist shall be recused.  This recommendation shall in no 
way alter or diminish the standard rules and procedures for challenging any 
expert panelist.
                
                
                I wanted to get a sense of the group and potentially doodle 
poll this.     Is anyone strongly opposed to a recommendation of this nature?

                Thanks

                RT

newzealand.govt.nz - connecting you to New Zealand central & local government 
services 


________________________________

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the 
Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files transmitted with 
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you 
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the 
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and 
that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the 
message and any attachment from your computer. 
________________________________


This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure 
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership 
with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, 
please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. 
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or 
recorded for legal purposes.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure 
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in 
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On 
leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or 
recorded for legal purposes.