<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:23:24 -0400
Hi,
I strongly oppose unless ALAC and GNSO can do so as well.
I have no objection to the 3 groups doing so as long as the individuals they
nominated meet the conditions set in the policy and have to be accepted by the
Board.
a.
On 19 Sep 2010, at 21:56, Richard Tindal wrote:
> All,
>
> We've discussed this on calls and email, and there seems to be a reasonable
> level of support/ non-objection for it.
>
> The Recommendation would look something like this:
>
> Recommendation: The GAC may nominate a suitably qualified expert panelist.
> In any situation where the GAC, or any of its members, are the initiator of
> an objection, including any IO objection triggered by the GAC, a GAC
> nominated panelist shall be recused. This recommendation shall in no way
> alter or diminish the standard rules and procedures for challenging any
> expert panelist.
>
> I wanted to get a sense of the group and potentially doodle poll this. Is
> anyone strongly opposed to a recommendation of this nature?
>
> Thanks
>
> RT
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|