<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- To: "Evan Leibovitch" <evan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26:07 -0400
Let me say again: It is too late to add additional recommendations. Please
focus on the recommendations on the table for our meeting today.
Chuck
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Evan Leibovitch
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 11:12 PM
To: Richard Tindal
Cc: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] GAC may nominate person for expert panel
On 19 September 2010 21:56, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx> wrote:
Recommendation: The GAC may nominate a suitably qualified expert
panelist. In any situation where the GAC, or any of its members, are the
initiator of an objection, including any IO objection triggered by the GAC, a
GAC nominated panelist shall be recused. This recommendation shall in no way
alter or diminish the standard rules and procedures for challenging any expert
panelist.
I wanted to get a sense of the group and potentially doodle poll this.
Is anyone strongly opposed to a recommendation of this nature?
Yes, absolutely opposed.
Either all stakeholders get a piece of picking advisors or none do.
- Evan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|