<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Question on your response to 5.4 polling in todays Rec6CWG
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Question on your response to 5.4 polling in todays Rec6CWG
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:26:59 -0700
The "lower body" (here an expert of group of experts) may not be making a
recommendation per se, but a finding of fact. So there's no recommendation to
accept. There's only an application to overturn.
Antony
On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> Cheryl,
> well if I'm in the minority I regret I will stay there.
> I believe a supermajority should be used consistently and carefully.
>
> So here as in any other case I believe the decision body (here ICANN Board)
> should:
> ACCEPT recommendations from a lower body by simple majority
> OVERTURN recommendations from a lower body by super majority.
>
> Perverting the simple / super majority to suit the issue is dangerous ground.
>
> Philip
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|