Re: [soac-mapo] Fw: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD Recommendation #6

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

I like to think we might have just explored a proactive and workable model
for proactive cross community input in future processes for ICANN...  Thanks
everyone it has been a real pleasure though rather intense work load wise in
the *very compressed* time frame we had, it only worked as well as it
did because of each of you and your commitment to making it happen and on
that I suspect I'm speaking on behalf of all the Rec6-CWG Co-Chairs...

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 22 September 2010 09:16, Antony Van Couvering
<avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Congratulations to everyone, myself least of all, for getting this done.
> Things can be accomplished quickly with good leadership, smart participants,
> and a will to get things finished.  And a deadline :-).
>
> And thanks to the staff for the assistance - absolutely invaluable.
>
> Antony
>
> Sent from my handheld.
>
> On Sep 21, 2010, at 15:58, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
> Chuck
>
>
>  *From*: David Olive [mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 06:29 PM
> *To*: Secretary <secretary@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc*: Gomes, Chuck; Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>; Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx<
> Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kurt Pritz <kurt@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD Recommendation #6
>
> Dear ICANN Secretary:
>
> This Board Communication is sent at the request of Chuck Gomes, Cheryl
> Langdon-Orr and Heather Dryden,  on behalf of the Recommendation 6 Community
> Working Group (Rec 6 CWG).
>
> This Report published on 21 September 2010 from the New gTLD Recommendation
> #6 Cross-Community Working Group (“Rec6 CWG”) addresses implementation of
> the GNSO Council’s New gTLD Recommendation # 6 (Rec6).   This Report
> describes recommendations for improving the proposed implementation plan for
> Rec6 as described in the Draft Applicant Guidebook-v4.
>
> There is consensus among the members of the Rec6 CWG that the proposed
> implementation model for Rec6 is flawed in certain respects and can be
> improved. The Rec6 CWG believes that the recommendations described in this
> Report, as summarized in Section 3 of this Report, and described in detail
> in Annex 3, would improve the implementation of Rec6.
>
> We kindly request that this Report be included in the materials for the
> Board’s consideration at the retreat.
>
> Thank you for your consideration of this request.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> David A. Olive
> Vice President, Policy Development Support
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> 1101 New York Avenue, NW - Suite 930 - Washington, D.C.    20005
> Office: 202.570.7126      Mobile:  202.341.3611
>
>  <Rec6 CWG Report- 21 Sept 2010-Final[1].pdf>
>
>