Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter

[Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Thanks, Jon.

- Evan


On 7 January 2011 10:33, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The letter works for me.  Thanks to Jon for the rapid response.
>
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Rec6 CWG Colleagues:
>>
>> Thanks for everyone's time on today's call.  Attached are redline and
>> clean versions of the proposed letter to the Board.  Please review and let
>> the group know if you have any changes/substantive objections.  We always
>> have the option -- as we discussed on the call -- to append any objections
>> from group members if they so desire.
>>
>> Please also take a close look at the last paragraph of the letter related
>> to the name of the Rec6 objections.  This came out of our final few minutes
>> on the call.  For one, I probably would delete this paragraph.  It seems a
>> bit petty and not all that helpful, but I don't feel strongly enough by any
>> means to append an objection on it.  I found an e-mail from Marika on
>> September 13th with the following poll results, which I think somewhat
>> weakens some of the points made on the call:
>>
>>  a.             "Objections Based on the Principles of Ordre Public":
>> 7/20
>>
>> b.            "Public Order Objections": 0/20
>>
>> c.            "Public Interest Objections": 8/20
>>
>> d.            "Objections Based on General Principles of International
>> Law': 14/20
>>
>> e.             “Objections based on the General Principles of Ordre
>> Public or International Law”: 9/20
>>
>>
>> As discussed, we are trying to have Chuck send the letter to the Board in
>> the next 24 hours to meet the Board's deadline.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
- Evan