<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter
- To: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter
- From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:33:48 -0500
The letter works for me. Thanks to Jon for the rapid response.
Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rec6 CWG Colleagues:
>
> Thanks for everyone's time on today's call. Attached are redline and clean
> versions of the proposed letter to the Board. Please review and let the
> group know if you have any changes/substantive objections. We always have
> the option -- as we discussed on the call -- to append any objections from
> group members if they so desire.
>
> Please also take a close look at the last paragraph of the letter related
> to the name of the Rec6 objections. This came out of our final few minutes
> on the call. For one, I probably would delete this paragraph. It seems a
> bit petty and not all that helpful, but I don't feel strongly enough by any
> means to append an objection on it. I found an e-mail from Marika on
> September 13th with the following poll results, which I think somewhat
> weakens some of the points made on the call:
>
> a. "Objections Based on the Principles of Ordre Public": 7/20
>
> b. "Public Order Objections": 0/20
>
> c. "Public Interest Objections": 8/20
>
> d. "Objections Based on General Principles of International
> Law': 14/20
>
> e. “Objections based on the General Principles of Ordre Public
> or International Law”: 9/20
>
>
> As discussed, we are trying to have Chuck send the letter to the Board in
> the next 24 hours to meet the Board's deadline.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Best,
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|