<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] charter language
- To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] charter language
- From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:35:02 -0700
Elaine
On May 10, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Elaine,
On 10 May 2010 17:12, Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Apologies for missing the call this morning.
I do have a comment on the charter, specifically Objective 2: To
identify how the application fee can be reduced to accommodate
applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this
benefit.
The term "reduced" indicates that the applicant would not have to
pay their fair share of the cost of the program.
That is an incorrect assumption. Note that the objective does not
assert that "the application fee for *some* can be reduced". By some
interpretations, the cost for *all* to apply is too high, set by an
inaccurate calculation of costs to be recovered. There is no issue
of unfairness if rates for *all* are lowered while maintaining
commitment to cost recovery, while the accessibility benefits are
still realized.
Are you saying objective 2 is to reduce the fees for all?
In addition, we have identified perspectives that might indicate
that certain kinds of applications can be deemed to be simpler to
process and thus cost less to ICANN.
I could see how a party with multiple applications might cost ICANN
less, for example, one technical review, but it seems a
"Disadvantaged" applicant will require more resources and assistance.
I guess that is what you mean below?
In such a case, such applications could be argued to be unfairly
overpaying, in that they are subsidizing the process for more
complex applications
The comments above are just speculation based on comments to date
and may not be ultimately reflected in the group's discussion or
conclusions. They suggest, however, that there exist approaches to
fee reduction that maintain both fairness and commitment to the
policy of cost-recovery, that ought to be explored and are within
scope.
- Evan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|