[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 13 July - follow up

[Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,
Please find some actions points below, following today's conference call:

1. There was agreement to structure the report largely as proposed by Avri 
(email attached for reference). Staff to pursue drafting of the admin pieces 
(the "upper and lower buns of the hamburger", as it were). WT1 and WT2 to 
pursue adding details as far as possible to their substance pieces (the "meat 
and condiments of the hamburger"), in view of the limited time frame to the 
deadline of 13 August.

2. Andrew (et al) provided an additional WT2 Q&A text for the call as a basis 
for discussion. Just got an email from him that he is updating it somewhat 
after the call and will provide it to the list when done, for further 
discussions on the list.

3. Work in WT1 and WT2 to be pursued on the list (emphasis added by the 
co-chairs during the call...). Aspects identified during the call for potential 
further work include:
- refinements/details for existing snapshot texts
- criteria and guidance for vetting of eligible applicants
- further considerations of AfriICANN document proposals

4. The possibility to do drafting on the Wiki has been enhanced by the addition 
of two drafting areas on the Wiki named "WT1 - working text" and "WT2 - working 
text" (with Andrew's current Q&A text pasted), both linked from our Wiki first 
page  (thanks to Avri for that!)

5. For good measure, please check that you can access the Wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi - and please tell me and 
Gisela if it doesn't work!

Very best regards
Olof

--- Begin Message ---

• To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Final document outline
• From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:10:03 -0700

Hi,

In terms of our final delivery document, my first suggestion (to start the 
discussion) in includes the following (with responsible party in parenthesis):

- (staff) Front-matter: Overview of working group - purpose, objectives, 
motions, history, description of working methods, summary.

- (WG) recommendation from the two WTs.  This should be essentially the 
snapshot + sufficient explanatory material for it to be clear to readers what 
is and is not included/recommended

 (this can be further broken down by the WT per Andrews suggestion)

- (WG co-chairs) recommended next steps including any possible extension of 
charter to do further work, e.g.
 - proposal for foundation
 - outreach for funding and helper organizations
 - other specific work that needs further development including fine tuning of 
proposals based on board, ALAC and GNSO evaluations

- (staff) back-matter including:

  - comments/questions received with response per comment/question
 -  copy of motions (Board, ALAC, GNSO)
 -  charter and explanation of the charter discrepancy on the last bullet
  - attendance sheets


with, of course everybody reviewing everybody's work.

We should probably plan on 2 review/word smith meeting before the 13 august 
delivery point.  We may need to hold more than one meeting in the last week(s).

a.

--- End Message ---