RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On co-chair actions and appeals

[Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks
" I do maintain, however, that I am  educable."
I hope I am to ;)

Sébastien Bachollet
sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+33 6 07 66 89 33

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-
> newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Avri Doria
> Envoyé : mardi 17 août 2010 16:30
> À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On co-chair actions and appeals
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just wanted to further my response to both Michele's and Sébastien's
> points. Any decision that is made by the co-chairs and that you cannot
> work out with the co-chairs can be appealed to the Liaisons.  You don't
> need a specific notice of the right to appeal any decision.  They are
> _all_ appealable if you find that necessary.
> 
> As I understand the process:
> 
> First you discuss with the co-chairs.   If we do not remedy to your
> satisfaction then you appeal to the Liaison.  If he/she does not remedy
> to your satisfaction then you appeal to the Chartering Organization(s).
> If they don't remedy to your satisfaction then you can attach a note to
> the report discussing your issues and your reasons for not being
> satisfied by the resolution or lack thereof.
> 
> On a personal note to Michele.  I am surprised that I wrote the reply
> in such a way as to indicate there could be no interpretation other
> than mine.  As an absolute relativist that is not normally my position
> on exegesis.  However, as a co-chair, and in other roles, it is often
> necessary to make a decision based on my best understanding and
> consultations with various others.  It is not my belief that this is
> the only possible decision, though it may be a decision that would
> require a predominance of evidence, or the word of a higher authority,
> for me to change.  I do maintain, however, that I am  educable.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> a.