[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: [] On co-chair actions and appeals

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

this is exactly what i argued for in the committee.
but i do not believe that is what the rules mandate.

but if our liaisons are fine with, I am fine with it.
i will accept the overrule.
gladly.

(i.e i am escalating the appeal to the liaisons - i want them on the hook with 
us)

i do recommend that the liaisons report this to the chartering organizations if 
that is what they decide.

a.

On 17 Aug 2010, at 14:31, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> 
> While its completely reasonable to ensure that people have SOIs that are kept 
> current, it takes a *lot* of time to go one-by-one to get everyone to say 
> "current" or "no change" or something like that.
> 
> Here is what I suggest.
>       • At the time recording starts, Staff reads a list of names of people 
> known to be on the call.
>       • Then a Chair asks, "is there is anyone on the call who has not yet 
> identified themselves."
>       • Then a Chair asks, "has anyone here changed their SOI circumstances 
> since our last meeting?"
>       • Anyone with a change speaks up. After sufficient time of silence, we 
> assume that all others are current and move on.
> All but step 3 are already being done. Adding #3 takes some time, but not 
> substantially.
> 
> Would this be acceptable?
> 
> - Evan