[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] feedback on the recommendations for board summary - can we clarify?

[Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Avri, Evan:

I briefly discussed with some new gTLD team members our WG draft final proposal 
and the fact that we want to present a summary of the recommendations to the 
Board for the September retreat.  Below is some feedback I would like to share  
with you. I suggest that we, at least for the Board September summary and next 
steps section of the Final Proposal, we could be clearer about the following:


*         In terms of the group's outcome, it is hard to tell what is being 
recommended.  For example in A, application fee aspects, is the WG suggesting 
that ICANN should make all of those adjustments or  simply pick one?



*         Similarly in B, is the WG suggesting that ICANN should provide all of 
those means of support or is it meant more as a menu?


*         Is this expected to be implemented for the first round?


*         Does the WG expect any modification to the Draft Applicant Guidebook 
to incorporate these proposals?



*         Will the final proposal go through public comments again?


Thank you,

Karla