[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: feedback on the recommendations for board summary - can we clarify?

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

As Elaine suggested, it would be useful if as many people as possible sent in 
their thoughts on these questions.

In the long run we should probably treat them as if they were any other 
comments and include them with responses in the annex of the document.  In so 
far as the answers give a clue to changes in the recommendations we can include 
them in the main part of the report.

So, please, if you have a view on the what the response to these Staff comments 
are, please send them to the list.

thanks

a.



On 1 Sep 2010, at 21:42, Karla Valente wrote:

> Dear Avri, Evan:
>  
> I briefly discussed with some new gTLD team members our WG draft final 
> proposal and the fact that we want to present a summary of the 
> recommendations to the Board for the September retreat.  Below is some 
> feedback I would like to share  with you. I suggest that we, at least for the 
> Board September summary and next steps section of the Final Proposal, we 
> could be clearer about the following:
>  
> ·         In terms of the group’s outcome, it is hard to tell what is being 
> recommended.  For example in A, application fee aspects, is the WG suggesting 
> that ICANN should make all of those adjustments or  simply pick one? 
>  
> ·         Similarly in B, is the WG suggesting that ICANN should provide all 
> of those means of support or is it meant more as a menu?
>  
> ·         Is this expected to be implemented for the first round?
>  
> ·         Does the WG expect any modification to the Draft Applicant 
> Guidebook to incorporate these proposals?
>  
> ·         Will the final proposal go through public comments again?
>  
>  
> Thank you,
>  
> Karla
>  
>