Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft of cover letter

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Looks good to me

RT


On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> 
> Proposed cover letter:
> 
> To:      The ICANN Board and the Chartering Organizations: ALAC and the GNSO 
> Council
> From: Co-chairs of the Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support
> 
> 
> The Working Group has made a great deal of progress since the Brussels 
> meeting and is well along in the process of finding the consensus point on 
> the recommendations.  the group have put a great deal of time into analyzing 
> the community comments and into reviewing the initial recommendations as 
> defined in the snapshot in the light of those comments.  While we near the 
> end of this process, we have not yet completed the process.
> 
> The enclosed document is an excerpt from the final output document of the WG 
> covering the WG objectives and its recommendations.  For the most part, the 
> items in this document have consensus.  In the few cases where there is still 
> an ongoing debate, the options are listed either in [bracketed text], or in 
> one case in an expanded section listing 2 options.
> 
> We hope that this second snapshot will be useful in your discussions on the 
> New gTLD Program.  We would appreciate any feedback you might have on our 
> discussions.  
> 
> Finally, we apologize for the delay in delivering this by the document 
> deadline and hope that you will receive and consider this document 
> nonetheless.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch
> Co-chairs, Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support 
> 
> 
> ----
> 
> The idea is that any issues that are resolved in the next day or so can be 
> forwarded to the board in the snapshot with those not yet resolved are marked 
> as ongoing  I just think there is too much consensual content in this 
> document to neglect to give the Board some input for their meeting.  In order 
> to give the boar time to read it we need to act quickly.  The deadline was 
> yesterday. I would like to send tomorrow (Wednesday).
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>