<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
- To: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
- From: Andrew Mack <amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
I agree with Elaine about the comments.
I also had some real confusion about some of the terms used in some questions,
specifically:
- in Question 6, when the poll says "the other criteria" are you talking about
items a-e that are mentioned in the document? I assume so, but would like to
know.
- in Question 8, when the poll says "Given that Registrars may not be open to
this specific proposal (voluntary contributions to a development fund), it
should not be included in the JAS report" what are we asking? I assume that
if you want the voluntary contributions to be included you would vote
"disagree", but it was unclear.
- in Question 13, have we defined a "marketing-oriented gTLD" anywhere? I
didn't remember discussion using this term.
- in Question 14, again this is one where we can simplify the language I think.
I believe you are asking if there should be an exception to the rule that
recommends against support for entities that mostly/completely government
sponsored. Is this what we are asking? If so, can we re-frame the question?
Appreciate getting greater clarity.
Thanks, Andrew
Andrew A. Mack
Principal
AMGlobal Consulting
+1-202-256-1077
amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.amglobal.com
________________________________
From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, October 14, 2010 1:01:26 PM
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
Is there a place on the poll for commenting?
On Oct 14, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Hello all,
>
>Sorry for the late notice.
>
>Please go to this link to take the survey so we can determine the level of
>support for some contentious issues.
>
>http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/388807/JAS-Working-Group-Consensus-Survey
>
>The results will be published and discussed at the next opportunity.
>
>- Evan
>
>
Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|