Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think that for the most part the context can be gotten from the full draft.  
If even that is unclear, then yes, we need to fix that text. real soon now  And 
if it is unclear, can I recommend that you give me some new text, or at least 
point out the text in the doc that is not clear.

I have been trying to process people's comments as i get them, and i put out a 
few revisions a week, so any help on making it language you think can be 
understood, would be greatly appreciated.

thanks
a.

On 14 Oct 2010, at 13:56, Andrew Mack wrote:

> I agree with Elaine about the comments.
> 
> I also had some real confusion about some of the terms used in some 
> questions, specifically:
> 
> - in Question 6, when the poll says "the other criteria" are you talking 
> about items a-e that are mentioned in the document?  I assume so, but would 
> like to know.
> 
> - in Question 8, when the poll says "Given that Registrars may not be open to 
> this specific proposal (voluntary contributions to a development fund), it 
> should not be included in the JAS report"  what are we asking?  I assume that 
> if you want the voluntary contributions to be included you would vote 
> "disagree", but it was unclear.
> 
> - in Question 13, have we defined a "marketing-oriented gTLD" anywhere?  I 
> didn't remember discussion using this term.  
> 
> - in Question 14, again this is one where we can simplify the language I 
> think.  I believe you are asking if there should be an exception to the rule 
> that recommends against support for entities that mostly/completely 
> government sponsored.  Is this what we are asking?  If so, can we re-frame 
> the question?
> 
> Appreciate getting greater clarity.
> Thanks, Andrew
> 
> Andrew A. Mack
> Principal
> AMGlobal Consulting
> 
> +1-202-256-1077 
> amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> www.amglobal.com
> 
> 
> From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thu, October 14, 2010 1:01:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
> 
> Is there a place on the poll for commenting?  
> 
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> Sorry for the late notice.
>> 
>> Please go to this link to take the survey so we can determine the level of 
>> support for some contentious issues.
>> 
>> http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/388807/JAS-Working-Group-Consensus-Survey
>> 
>> The results will be published and discussed at the next opportunity.
>> 
>> - Evan
>> 
> 
> Elaine Pruis
> VP Client Services
> elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 509 899 3161
> 
>