Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey

[Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 14 October 2010 15:02, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>    - in Question 14, again this is one where we can simplify the language
> I think.  I believe you are asking if there should be an exception to the
> rule that recommends against support for entities that mostly/completely
> government sponsored.  Is this what we are asking?  If so, can we re-frame
> the question?
>
>
>
> I agree that the wording does seem clumsy and I apologize. The gist from
> the survey question is to determine that there may be some exceptions to the
> government-funding restrictions. While there is certainly some room to
> clarify the point, I recall divergence on whether there should be certain
> exceptions to the restriction against applications with government funding.
>
> But we can and should definitely revisit the final wording.
>
> - Evan
>
> No Evan, I didn’t understand it in this way. I understood that you mean
> that some applicants with some government support (not entirely government
> support or not Government applications) should be eligible, and I voted for
> this.
>
Sorry, you're right.

But the wording can still use some cleanup :-)

- Evan